Skip to main content

My Identity Exploration: Christina U. King


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Figured Worlds

Figured Worlds Guiding Questions: What figured world is constructed? What artifacts pivot the activity?What identities are performed? What agency and power is exerted or resisted in this data sample? What sociocultural norms are performed or resisted (cultural, linguistic, racial, gendered, religious, class….) In what ways are these figured worlds familiar or new to you? Following this week's reading, I believe that I have a better understanding of Holland et al. (1998) definition of figured worlds. All of this week's reading - Barron, 2013; Gelfuso & Dennis, 2017; and Blackburn, 2002-2003) reference the definition of a complex and multi-layered concept of identity, and Barron (2013) and Blackburn (2002-2003) reference the 4 key concepts or contexts of identity: "figured world, positionality, space of authoring, and making worlds" (Barron, 2013, p. 5; Blackburn, 2002-2003, pp. 313-314).  I suppose that this week's articles figured worlds are somewhat fa...
Making Sense of Figured Worlds and Identity How I am making sense of figured worlds After reading Holland et al. (1998) Identity and Agency in Cultural Worlds, I find myself seeing the world of academia, of which I am currently immersed, as a figured world in the truest sense. According to the authors, "figured worlds rest upon people's abilities to form and be formed in collectively realized "as if" realms" (p. 49). Their question of "What if there were a world called academia, where books were so significant that people would sit for hours on end, away from friends and family, writing them?" really resonated with me.  Academia is a figured world, created by those who positioned themselves as more knowledgeable than others and therefore capable of researching, scrutinizing, criticizing, and then writing about others in comparison to themselves and those whom they esteem. Holland et al. (1998) talk about the figured world as "a socially a...

Making Sense of New Literacies

When thinking of New Literacies Studies (Street, 2003), I am inclined to think of it as a critical social practice which asks the questions of : Whose literacies are dominant? Whose literacies are marginalized? and Whose literacies are resistant? Literacy then is not a technical or neutral skill as the autonomous model of literacy would suggest. Rather, literacy is closer akin to the ideological model of literacy which posits that it is a social practice that is always embedded in socially constructed epistemological principles (Street, 2003, p. 77). Within NLS there are literacy events and literacy practice that work upon a continuum of sorts, with a shift from observing literacy events to conceptualizing literacy practices (Street, 2003, p. 79). Street (2003, 1998), describes the shift as involving both "events" (Heath, 1982) and social models of literacy that participants bring to bear upon those events and that give meaning to them. Wohlwend (2009) provides us with th...